Skip to main content

Crowdsourcing & Pop Culture

In reading about the topics this week, crowdsourcing stood out to me as a term I had heard of, knew a little bit about, but hadn't ever really given much thought to. The more I read about it though, the more I kept thinking about different ways I've seen, or even been apart of, crowdsourcing. In the article,  Stolen snow shovels and good ideas: The search for and generation of local knowledge in the social media community (Konsti-Laakso, S. 2017), the authors provide a literature review on online communities and crowdsourcing. The article references "three basic components of crowdsourcing: individuals (the crowd), an organization looking to benefit from the crowd's inputs and an online platform through which the communication occurs (Nam, 2012)." 

There are lots of examples of crowdsourcing, the article above makes reference to government policies that are affected through crowdsourcing, other articles discuss scientific ideas that were assisted through crowdsourcing, but some famous ones you might be familiar with also include: 
Lay's "Do Us a Flavor" 

Based on the three components described above, what about reality/voting TV shows, would those be categorized as crowdsourcing?  They are made up of individuals, they benefit from a crowd's input (this is how contestants are kept on or voted off the show) and the voting mostly occurs online, although it can occasionally occur over the phone. I would think that much in the way the crowd votes for its favorite potato chip flavor, it is also choosing its next American Idol. 

I'm not much for reality TV or the talent competitions, however every so often I get invested in a good season of Dancing with the Stars (Tallahassee folks, who didn't like seeing David Ross out there??), now I can't help but think, is it all just great crowdsourcing keeping these shows going? Here's an interview from Entrepreneur.com that provides more information about crowdsourcing, it's implications for businesses and thoughts on how it's changing. 






References:

Konsti-Laakso, S. (2017). Stolen snow shovels and good ideas: The search for and generation of local knowledge in the social media community. Government Information Quarterly, 34(1), 134-139.

Nam, T. (2012). Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via government 2.0. Gov. Inf. Q., 29(1), 12–20.

Comments

  1. UnknownJuly 15, 2018 at 4:48 AM

    Here's another crowdsourcing link that I remember from recent history at our local zoo. I think that this kind of crowdsourcing serves marketing purposes, but it also makes community members feel invested in the zoo, its animals, and to the specific endangered species. Hopefully, such campaigns spur at least some participants to investigate further and become even more engaged in protecting wildlife. https://www.palmbeachzoo.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=news.details&ArticleId=500014&returnTo=main

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Two Favorite New Tools

We're three weeks in and I've tried many of the tools that have been mentioned. Sometimes I only get as far as exploring the websites or apps before deciding it's not really for me, other times I post once or twice or at least lurk. However, this week there are two clear winners for me: Pocket  and Goodreads .  Pocket was new to me, and as soon as I downloaded it and read the instructions (I put it on my phone) I knew it would be a great addition! I am guilty of keeping far too many tabs open on all my devices. I like to read a lot of articles, but don't always get time to finish them, or I find recipes I want to save, places I want to visit, etc. Pocket is like Pinterest but I think the functionality is more practical for me. I could log in with my Gmail account, which makes it even easier and all my articles are saved right there. There's a page for trending articles, and you can even see how many times pages have been saved. This tool will be so useful in keepi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Integrating Web 2.0

In learning about Web 2.0 concepts this week, I, of course, began to see Web 2.0 everywhere. I can see how meaningful the relationships can be when people, and for my work, students interact with one another and generate their own content on these Web 2.0 platforms. We love to see students engage with us and participate in career discussions. While working on a project today, I was reminded of Web 2.0 concepts although the project itself was not digital content. The task was to create a worksheet that outlined career-readiness competencies and examples. The worksheet would also have blank spaces where the students would be encouraged to write in things they have done to gain those competencies/skills ( generate content ) and space to brainstorm organizations or activities on campus where they could achieve those skills ( connect with others ).  As we were working on this project, I was starting to notice similar concepts to Web 2.0 definitions.  It made me wonder if we are d...
1 comment
Read more

An Introduction to Wiki

I was introduced to Wiki not too long after this class started. Only about a week in, really. Before that, I had thought it was some offshoot of a Wikipedia page, I guess. I was working on a student who was job searching and he shared that one of his sources was a Wiki page. Obviously, this confused me. I am always open to learning new resources for job search sites, but a Wiki page? He explained that on the page people start a thread for when new academic jobs are posted at an institution, then they update each other on where they are in the hiring process. For example, whoever gets a call for a first interview will share when they got the call and when they are scheduled for that interview. Second interview candidates are supposed to give that information, and so on. The purpose being that other people who have applied aren't feeling like they are in limbo uncertain if that university has begun the hiring process or not.  While in theory, this sounds like a good idea. I'm s...
1 comment
Read more

Twitter

Pinterest